"The solution offers great features."
"It has all collaboration features, such as document sharing, video conferencing, chatting, task sharing, and calendar sharing."
"One of the most valuable features involves the solution's automatic backup, which I find to be pretty simple and straightforward, and obviates the need for additional software."
"Zimbra Collaboration is light to manage. It works on the Linux operating system, which is far better to manage than Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Exchange works only on the Windows server. We prefer working on the Linux server for security reasons and ease of management. Zimbra Collaboration also has some integrated tools for security. It some modules to fight malware. These modules are not very powerful but are still doing a great job. Microsoft Exchange doesn't have a basic module. You have to purchase a security solution and add it to the solution. The cost of Zimbra Collaboration is one more reason for liking it. It is also very simple to migrate from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution."
"Zimbra Collaboration's sharing features are most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Zimbra for our team's productivity is its efficiency in handling email communication."
"The logs, troubleshooting, and tracking we have found to be the most valuable features. We have any issues with lost messages the features are useful. It is very easy to track and log."
"The Zimbra Collaboration's most valuable feature is web access."
"Zimbra Collaboration is a good tool for video calls...Zimbra Collaboration's initial setup phase was easy."
"NVMe support is lacking when it comes to performance on the disk side."
"We have had an issue with security."
"The tool should improve its multi-cloud feature."
"The product must be more customizable."
"Zimbra Collaboration does not have a solution roadmap as aggressive as the new collaboration mail solutions. Additionally, they can have a better interface and integration with single sign-on."
"There are some security issues."
"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."
"File sharing permissions with Nextcloud integration need improvement."
"The support was lacking in my experience. However, recently the support I received was good. Perhaps they have improved."
Earn 20 points
CodeTwo Exchange Rules is ranked 3rd in Email Signature Software while Zimbra Collaboration is ranked 4th in Email Applications with 27 reviews. CodeTwo Exchange Rules is rated 9.0, while Zimbra Collaboration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CodeTwo Exchange Rules writes "Great features that enabled us to reduce hardware at our on-prem sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zimbra Collaboration writes "Provides good email capability; lacking in security and performance". CodeTwo Exchange Rules is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online and Exclaimer Signature Manager, whereas Zimbra Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Open-Xchange, IceWarp, Google Workspace and KerioConnect.
We monitor all Email Signature Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.