"The solution offers great features."
"Good email solution and it's open-source."
"The web interface is powerful and easy to use."
"The configuration is simple."
"We can control all the data in my IT infrastructure."
"Zimbra Collaboration is a good tool for video calls...Zimbra Collaboration's initial setup phase was easy."
"The stability is good and keeps getting better with each new update."
"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is email functionality."
"The logs, troubleshooting, and tracking we have found to be the most valuable features. We have any issues with lost messages the features are useful. It is very easy to track and log."
"NVMe support is lacking when it comes to performance on the disk side."
"The solution could improve by making it easier to use."
"Zimbra must improve its solution to make it easy so that the users don't have to use webmail to connect to their accounts and log in to webmail every time. This is something that is lacking in Zimbra Collaboration. They should provide a better way to easily connect email applications on the desktop to the Zimbra server. They should also try to have more functionality for storage management, like Microsoft Exchange. Currently, the management of the email data must be done manually in Zimbra Collaboration, which we are finding very difficult. They should provide a way to save emails so that you can have more space on the server and storage. Because of the lack of this functionality, we are planning to migrate to Microsoft Exchange. Microsoft Exchange provides a better way to manage storage than Zimbra Collaboration. You cannot have a mail solution without storage management because emails will always increase. Zimbra Collaboration also needs tools for management. More back-office tools are required to manage the whole mailbox and space. You don't only manage emails but also the documents attached to the emails. Therefore, you require tools to select and decide what do you want to save or how do you want to free up space in your infrastructure."
"It does have a few bugs."
"The solution could use more integration with third-party tools."
"The product must be more customizable."
"In the next release, Zimbra Collaboration should include a security feature to allow access for mobile device administrators."
"We have had an issue with security."
"Zimbra Collaboration could improve the migration from a basic solution to a more containerized solution. For example, the installation should be able to extend to the containers and manage them with some solution, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes."
Earn 20 points
CodeTwo Exchange Rules is ranked 3rd in Email Signature Software while Zimbra Collaboration is ranked 4th in Email Applications with 27 reviews. CodeTwo Exchange Rules is rated 9.0, while Zimbra Collaboration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CodeTwo Exchange Rules writes "Great features that enabled us to reduce hardware at our on-prem sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zimbra Collaboration writes "Provides good email capability; lacking in security and performance". CodeTwo Exchange Rules is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online and Exclaimer Signature Manager, whereas Zimbra Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Open-Xchange, IceWarp, Google Workspace and KerioConnect.
We monitor all Email Signature Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.