We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the documentation. It's a central platform, and there are many things that I can do with it. I'm very pleased about it."
"I love the reports and the Confluence board."
"The solution offers a lot of freedom when drafting directly online."
"Great shareable and co-editing features."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence it's very easy to use and there are different options."
"It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"Confluence is easy to use and integrate with other solutions, including social media platforms."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"For SharePoint, I believe the most valuable feature is the customization and allowing you to share and edit files and documents. Being able to share externally and the precise administration of the files in terms of giving permissions and controlling who has access to what is a very good feature."
"The search feature is valuable."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible."
"Its functionality is enormous."
"SharePoint has made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories."
"Our staff found it simpler, as they did not have to work within a classification system."
"The UI is good but bland. It could be updated a bit to make it more modern and interesting to look at."
"The dashboards should be improved."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"The user interface could be improved."
"Confluence cannot replace Microsoft Word at the moment, so even though it can be used as a document management system, it is not meant for document creation, which adds a lot of limitations to it."
"The roadmap feature should be made easier to work with and modify. It's not really scalable."
"The standard table capability is substandard and virtually unusable."
"The way Atlassian Confluence handles tickets could be improved."
"No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository."
"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."
"I understand that some functions are lost when you store the information in a file system, so maybe that's a way SharePoint can improve."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
"Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."
"SharePoint designer workflows can be buggy sometimes without any apparent reason."
"The product must provide more automation."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 98 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.