We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"The solution is very intuitive and provides excellent content management."
"Easy to share information and the integration with JIRA is good."
"This is a scalable solution that supports thousands of users."
"It is stable and reliable."
"I think that it is one of the best products on the market from my experience."
"This solution allowed us to easily input details beyond just text, such as creating basic data charts to monitor team performance."
"A simple tool for developers to write and record team decisions explaining the product that they are creating."
"It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."
"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."
"The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities."
"It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"Removed the need of paper storage and people flow into the office."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"Its most valuable feature is the document library."
"I think the couple of improvement areas would be around Markdown support and support for adding code."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve the stability, there are timeouts sometimes."
"The product is considered expensive."
"RAM usage seems to be higher than it should be."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"Some aspects of the drawing perspective could be improved. When we upgrade a design and make technical architecture drawings to publish, we still use Visio first and then copy and paste it. If this feature were available on Confluence, it would be a useful tool."
"The user interface could be improved."
"Confluence cannot replace Microsoft Word at the moment, so even though it can be used as a document management system, it is not meant for document creation, which adds a lot of limitations to it."
"Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users."
"No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository."
"Allow more functionalities for the on-premise version. Do not force the move of content to a non-private cloud."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."
"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."
"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."
"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 98 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.