We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of use has been one of the most valuable features. It has a very simple wiki."
"The most valuable features are hyper-linking, the Drawing Tool, and enhanced tables."
"The trial stages, the ability to connect it to Jira, and the ability to export in PDF are all good capabilities."
"It is stable and reliable."
"What I find the most valuable about Confluence is how easy it is to use."
"It's easy to search for information."
"The solution is very intuitive and provides excellent content management."
"The solution is stable."
"Removed the need of paper storage and people flow into the office."
"Its functionality is enormous."
"It is very stable."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services."
"We would like there to be more advanced data manipulation features available in this solution, such as creating more complex charts, and a column freezing option."
"There could be an option to collaborate with other users while editing the documents."
"The way Atlassian Confluence handles tickets could be improved."
"I think the couple of improvement areas would be around Markdown support and support for adding code."
"We have to use other applications that make Atlassian Confluence more customized for what you want. They should improve by adding the ability to make more customizations."
"When we import the data in Confluence from Word or any other document, the formatting is not correct."
"Atlassian Confluence's old versions consume too much memory, making it an area where optimization is required from an improvement perspective."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"Improve the user-friendliness."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
"Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents."
"The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to the cloud can also use improvement."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"More hints and make it more user-customizable."
"The product must provide more automation."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 98 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.