We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the ease of creating documentation, as well as charts."
"This solution allowed us to easily input details beyond just text, such as creating basic data charts to monitor team performance."
"The ease of use has been one of the most valuable features. It has a very simple wiki."
"It is easy to use."
"We have found limiting permissions and history very valuable."
"I like the documentation. It's a central platform, and there are many things that I can do with it. I'm very pleased about it."
"The most valuable feature is the accessibility from different sites for different colleagues and the search option."
"The most valuable features are hyper-linking, the Drawing Tool, and enhanced tables."
"It has an easy to distribute administration capability, and can also scale to meet a large number of future needs."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"The product makes it easy to manage lists, forms, searching, and security. One of the most valuable features is its integration with Active Directory."
"There are some issues with performance when creating tables."
"Space maintenance could be made a little more user-friendly."
"When we have a project that we don't want to share with everybody but want people to know that it exists, there is no way to do this in Confluence. When a project is not shared, people cannot see that it exits."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"Atlassian Confluence should improve the interface, it needs to be more user-friendly. It is easy to use, but it could be more intuitive."
"RAM usage seems to be higher than it should be."
"The price could be improved. I have heard that certain adjustments would be made in 2024 and that it will then be more expensive, but I don't know the specifics."
"The product should have a workflow with approvals out-of-the-box."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."
"The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to the cloud can also use improvement."
"The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control."
"Make it more intuitive."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 98 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.