We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."It helps us to analyze vulnerabilities way before they get installed in production and the web. It gives us more security in the production environment."
"The CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool has several significant features that provide security to our company."
"The most valuable feature is posture management, which gives you complete visibility of all your assets in the cloud and allows you to do governance and compliance."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"Compliance is becoming an important tool for us as well."
"It presents a real-time database that is always updated."
"All of the features are very useful in today's market."
"Its monitoring and alerts are triggered by a failure or non-compliance with policies. It helps us to be able to act effectively and quickly."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"There are fewer false positives when using this solution."
"Tech support is helpful."
"The process of defining and discovering scans is organized efficiently."
"It is a stable solution."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"I find Qualys VM very robust, and it's very useful for vulnerability management and patch management. The value that it brings to my environment is economies of scale. There is no limitation on adding any endpoints. You go by the rule, and it's added once another endpoint is added to our environment. It's automatically installed, and it's less work from our end. It frees up my license automatically if I don't need an endpoint or if my machine is decommissioned. I like the dashboard displays because I don't see any duplication. The most important part is vulnerability management and prioritization. Unlike Symantec, it shows the kind of vulnerability I would want to patch first. It provides a holistic view of the kind of vulnerabilities and the ones I should remediate first. I don't have to do a scan; it just brings up those critical kinds of vulnerabilities like zero-day vulnerabilities and tells me to prioritize them. You have to prioritize these vulnerabilities first and go on with the rest. The dashboard shows me the ones that have been fixed, so I don't have to complete an aging report. The user experience and the graphical interface are good. As it's user-friendly and understandable on an executive level, it brings real value. We also use this solution because it's robust and flexibile."
"Currently, I would like this solution extended to cellular devices or tablets."
"No improvements are needed."
"When rules change, it messes up the remediation. They haven't found a fix for that yet. The remediation rule goes into limbo. It's an architectural design flaw within their end compliance engine—a serious bug."
"Down the road, we would like to see automation. That is probably a feature that most people want. If they can automate patching a vulnerability, it will be much easier."
"The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there."
"The security of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could improve. There are always new security issues coming out."
"We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs."
"We want to be able to customize the solution more in order to meet the needs of our company."
"Finding things in management can be quite difficult."
"I do not like that all of the data is stored on the cloud."
"Qualys VM should improve its methodology."
"If anything, I would like to see the user interface modernized a bit more."
"Qualys currently does not have any features for scanning SCADA, IoT, and Industrial Control Systems."
"The reporting and dashboards could improve in Qualys VM. However, they have improved since the previous versions."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"The reporting needs improvement. It should generate much more stuff like field reports."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 58 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 76 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.4, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
