We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."We know the vulnerability in advance, so we can take some action for that vulnerability."
"The most valuable feature is posture management, which gives you complete visibility of all your assets in the cloud and allows you to do governance and compliance."
"The most valuable feature is the single dashboard that enables us to manage the entire cloud environment from one place."
"The automatic learning and an AI engine help to find more modern vulnerability problems."
"The initial setup is easy and not complex at all."
"It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database."
"On Dome9, you can have reports on compliance, users created, and EAM access to the cloud infrastructure. For example, if some machine is exposed to the Internet, importing and exporting to the Internet when it shouldn't, we get immediate alerts if someone does this type of configuration by mistake. Dome9 is very important because AWS doesn't protect us for this. It is the client's responsibility to make sure that we don't export things to the Internet. This solution helps us ensure that we comply with our security measures."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"The solution shows us classic categories, including high, medium, and low risks. It also shows critical items, and that gives us the advantage of prioritizing things."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"It's stable and quite reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Qualys Container Security is the detailed information in the reports and the remediation. This is done to make sure there are no vulnerabilities."
"We were demotivated by the lack of native automation modules for the Terraform and Ansible tools."
"There are opportunities for improvement that can be addressed through a roadmap."
"Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."
"Their service needs improvement."
"Dome9 should also support deployments that are on-premises and in a hybrid cloud."
"The costs are high."
"I'd like to see more advanced encryption for local features, which is not present right now."
"Timely updates and upgrades to meet modern technological changes could help improve performance and limit the chances of downtime."
"There needs to be better documentation."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"Certain integration factors between different options could be improved."
"When you want to cover yourself for scalability, you will be charged for the number you place on the scan itself."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
"Integration could be better. When you think about scanning, it's not used just with this product alone but with other Qualys products. If you think about the bundle, the product itself is good. But integration with other products and packages has space for improvement. They should also offer a better price for bundles."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 58 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 76 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.4, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
