We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."We like the GSL Builder feature. When you're running a security operations center, you spend a lot of time monitoring endpoint activity to ensure there is no malicious traffic or anonymous access in the environment. The GSL Builder is helpful for deep investigations of a particular reason for an incident. You can use it to get more information."
"This solution provides threat prevention and detection of anomalies automatically and investigates the activity of each one of them."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the training."
"Dome9 continues to be a major piece of our cloud security architecture and has given our senior leadership team a high degree of confidence in our ability to protect our cloud environment."
"The way they offer container security is a big highlight that I have noticed. The solution is also agentless, so the scanning, runtime, really everything is offered directly by CloudGuard."
"On Dome9, you can have reports on compliance, users created, and EAM access to the cloud infrastructure. For example, if some machine is exposed to the Internet, importing and exporting to the Internet when it shouldn't, we get immediate alerts if someone does this type of configuration by mistake. Dome9 is very important because AWS doesn't protect us for this. It is the client's responsibility to make sure that we don't export things to the Internet. This solution helps us ensure that we comply with our security measures."
"It provides the most useful tools for protecting our financial account records from hackers."
"The most valuable feature is the single dashboard that enables us to manage the entire cloud environment from one place."
"Qualys VM's best feature is vulnerability management."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Qualys VM had a recent upgrade and the newer version is supporting the cloud."
"This is one of the best products I have worked with so far. I like the power of Qualys, and it's a better solution because you can scan a compact file, a BIT file, or batch files. The product already knows what's happening inside, and you don't need to expand the package. Tenable will do the same thing, but you need to have a package issuance claim. With Qualys, we can immediately understand the file, even a compact file. If there's some kind of discovery or incident, you will know what happened in the environment."
"Tech support is helpful."
"It's stable and quite reliable."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"Down the road, we would like to see automation. That is probably a feature that most people want. If they can automate patching a vulnerability, it will be much easier."
"I would like to see some AI on the back-end, just to assist with doing analysis and making recommendations."
"Timely updates and upgrades to meet modern technological changes could help improve performance and limit the chances of downtime."
"Automatic remediation requires read/write access. When providing read/write access to third-party applications, this can add risk. It should have some options of triggering API calls to the cloud platform, which in turn, can make the required changes."
"I would like them to include support for their products in languages other than English."
"I would like to see improvements in the vulnerability assessments in terms of how the solution discovers vulnerabilities or compromised workloads. Also, customizable reports would be nice."
"The tool has a lot of potential, but today, it lacks a lot of Scripts/Bots for Azure."
"It does not support on-premise deployments such as VMware Tanzu, and this has been a major drawback when it comes to integrations with some applications."
"If anything, I would like to see the user interface modernized a bit more."
"The reporting and dashboards could improve in Qualys VM. However, they have improved since the previous versions."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"Reports were lacking somewhat on the customization side."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"The solution is a bit expensive if you do not have access to discounts."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"Qualys VM's machine learning and artificial intelligence features could be improved."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 56 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 76 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.4, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Wiz and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.