We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database."
"Alerts of cloud activity happening across all accounts is helpful."
"The most valuable features of CloudGuard CNAPP are its compliance engine and auto-remediation features."
"The rulesets and the findings are valuable. The actual core functionality of it and the efficacy of events are great."
"The user interface is responsive and quite intuitive; when selecting an object it automatically shows the relevant actions."
"Dome9 has improved our organization; we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. And then all the policies are centralized, and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console."
"The most valuable feature is posture management, which gives you complete visibility of all your assets in the cloud and allows you to do governance and compliance."
"The most valuable feature is the single dashboard that enables us to manage the entire cloud environment from one place."
"Detects new hosts along with vulnerabilities."
"The solution shows us classic categories, including high, medium, and low risks. It also shows critical items, and that gives us the advantage of prioritizing things."
"Qualys VM's most valuable feature is automatic detection."
"Vulnerability management is the most valuable one and it’s a must in every organization."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The prioritization feature is great. I think it has all of the advanced features that we need."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"One feature of the product that I would like to enhance is the possibility to connect to vulnerability management platforms so that the issues that emerge from the scans can then be ingested directly into the vulnerability management process."
"Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."
"The reporting has a lot of opportunities to continuously improve so that we can continue to show value."
"Making basic rules is easy, but it's complex if you want to do something a little more nuanced. I've been unable to make some rules that I wanted. I couldn't evaluate some values or parameters of the components I look for. I haven't always been able to assess them."
"CloudGuard could be more customizable. It has built-in standards for things like GDPR compliance. But depending on your business lane, you might want to build your own controls based on your own standards."
"The main issue that we found with Dome9 is that we have a default rule set with better recommendations that we want to use. So, you do a clone of that rule set, then you do some tweaks and customizations, but there is a problem. When they activate the default rule set with the recommendations and new security measures, it doesn't apply the new security measures to your clones profile. Therefore, you need to clone the profile again. We are already writing a report to Check Point."
"The reporting dashboard responds slowly, which leads to late report compilation."
"In Dome9, there should be a policy validation option where we can validate the policy before we push it into production."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"Qualys could be improved in its overall performance compared to other vulnerability management or scanning tools."
"The solution is a bit expensive if you do not have access to discounts."
"Could use additional security for the app."
"They're still evolving their platform in terms of reporting capabilities."
"Its integration with ServiceNow and other similar products is complicated and can be improved. It should also have virtual batching. They should support more standards and compliance requirements and more customizations. For policy compliance, they can add the standards required by the countries in the Middle East. Each country generates its own standards and frameworks, and those frameworks should be there in all products, not only in Qualys. The market here is huge, especially in the cybersecurity field. Qatar has a framework for Qatar 2022, and each and every company in the public or private sector has to follow the Qatar 2022 framework."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 59 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 76 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.4, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.