We performed a comparison between Drupal and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"It is good for big projects."
"What I like about SharePoint is that they keep up with a lot of updates, and they bring out new features. I also like that the system is integrated with the Microsoft 365 suite of apps."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"Its functionality is enormous."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution."
"For any organization with more than one person in it, if they are trying to organize things to let people in the company know what others are doing, then this solution is good for them."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
"The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control."
"Needs improvement on the user interface."
"Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."
"Make it more intuitive."
"I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools."
"We would like more security features, like automating."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
Earn 20 points
Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 146 reviews. Drupal is rated 8.6, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Drupal is most compared with WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS, Atlassian Confluence and Liferay Digital Experience Platform, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
