We performed a comparison between Drupal and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"It is good for big projects."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."
"The search feature is valuable."
"The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution."
"It has made us faster and more efficient."
"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
"There are some limitations on storage."
"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"Processing data from multiple site collections is not easy as they reside in different databases."
"Make it more intuitive."
Earn 20 points
Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 146 reviews. Drupal is rated 8.6, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Drupal is most compared with WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS, Atlassian Confluence and Liferay Digital Experience Platform, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.