We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."In terms of AI, I love the base-lining Dynatrace provides us. It baselines the application over a seven-day period; we have it at the default of seven days. The artificial intelligence is so amazing because it can automatically track each transaction and their response times: how much CPU they use, how much memory, resources that they use. If there’s any deviation from that Dynatrace will tell me like right away. If there’s a deployment and the deployment has increased response time or is taking up CPU or has caused a memory leak, I can say, “Hey guys, you need to look at this, it’s this function on this page in this microservice, in this docker container. You need to go here, you need to fix it, it’s not going live.” It has just increased our productivity off the charts."
"It makes our lives easier as we drill down to problems."
"Our company gets quick response times and qualified responses from technical support, so that is good."
"We like the on-premises platform and the horizontal scalability."
"Dynatrace has the most features compared to other products we looked at."
"The most valuable feature is the beautiful UI."
"The PurePaths are valuable because that's where somebody who is a non-developer can figure out where the problem is and send appropriate PurePaths, clean charts, or even the link to the developer. The developer can then look at it and figure out exactly where the problem is, this is the piece of code that took the longest time, and then resolve it."
"We can see all the degradation of services in real-time, then we know exactly what the root cause of degradation is."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"The web interface, in some cases, is a little ambiguous to use."
"We need more AI in the product to avoid manual analysis."
"Improvements in Synthetic monitoring would be great. Certain features of thick client, if available in the web interface, would also be a great improvement."
"The web version of the client interface needs more features that are in the Java-based thick client."
"I did like the old dashboards, the legacy 6.3 for example; the way we were able to do the dashboarding in the client. I would like to be able to see that in the new version of Dynatrace."
"Dynatrace must reduce the required resources for on-premise, because they are too high."
"It requires manual intervention to uninstall the cloud agent from servers you want it removed from."
"If we can gain more insight into older applications, using not-so-recent technologies, then it would be a plus."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 16 reviews while TruView is ranked 53rd in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "Allows us to monitor application performance, underlying infrastructure, and relationships with Smartscape technology". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "Efficient monitoring, data visibility and easy overview of all data on a single view". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor and Zabbix.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.