We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."It creates visibility - from when the user starts interacting with our application - all the way back to our database calls, our network path, everything."
"The geographical view provides a nice visualization of performance on a map."
"The best feature of the product for me is the real troubleshooting capability through the PurePath analysis."
"We purchased some coaching sessions and utilized those, which were very useful."
"It is very stable. The improvements that they keep making just make the tool more useful."
"The most valuable things that we have seen are the user experience and capturing what the users are doing inside the browser."
"This solution has helped our organization on multiple occasions. The synthetic monitor came in particularly handy."
"The server monitoring is very accurate in this tool. We are able to prevent many critical Incidents."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"If you have many distributed servers, you will need to install or migrate every agent. This can be a problem if you have too many, and it takes time."
"They could have a better user interface, better automation, better support for cloud-based, and SaaS applications."
"They need better infrastructure monitoring. New Relic is beating them for infrastructure monitoring."
"Dashboards and monitoring capabilities can be improved for monitoring applications in Azure. In Azure, it would be cool to be able to monitor network consumption as well as flow communication."
"The problem evaluation feature is an awesome idea, but bit difficult to pick up initially."
"Make it easier to define applications. E.g., provide an API for applications defined by REST services."
"We have some issues with react user sessions."
"Its needs to focus more on open source areas, like Apache umbrella products and availability motioning areas."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 340 reviews while TruView is ranked 54th in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.