We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."UEM helps to identify user experience and detailed steps performed by the user."
"The solution's ability to assess the severity of anomalies based on the actual impact to users and business KPIs is great. It's exactly what we need. The severity impact is based on the users, the availability, and the impact it has on your business."
"Great tool for deep diving into performance data and tracking issues through all the connected systems to better diagnose and pinpoint the real issues."
"I get valuable information like, for example, if a site is down. That's the key. I'm instantly getting a message, or even on the app, I can see if something overnight went down a few times, or it's not performing at 100%."
"We are able to see globally our end user response time tracing down to the user ID."
"I find that the AI on offer is useful, as it's good at identifying problems. You do need a bit of customizing, however, even in its sort of vanilla form, it's pretty good at identifying problems and the root causes of those problems and whatnot."
"Enables me to proactively understand the user experience on our site."
"Data analytics help us to find us issues in the short-term or long-term."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"It needs .NET core support to the level of Java."
"As we move into using more AWS native architectures, it should support everything that we want to do. We don't want to adopt another tool."
"When compared with other tools, the experience needs improvement. I would like them to build out the interactions and make them friendlier."
"C language integration requires manual implementation through the SDK, which is rather difficult and time consuming."
"It needs a better way to figure out how to dig deeper into the details, e.g., sometimes we have to wade through multiple logs, etc."
"Product reporting still needs improvement."
"The initial setup was challenging for us. However, it was complex until you grasped the nuances of the product and the building blocks."
"This solution needs improvement in terms of automation."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 340 reviews while TruView is ranked 54th in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.