We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Data analytics help us to find us issues in the short-term or long-term."
"We scaled from 300 agents to 800 agents in six months. There were no issues at the server level, which is pretty good."
"We can go back to when a specific user had an issue and trace the entire transaction from the client to the database."
"It scales well. We are going to be able to use it for everything we need. "
"The web dashboards are quite useful, good looking, and easy to use."
"We had point solutions where we could see different elements of the stack, and Dynatrace ties everything together. Before, we could never get that full-stack monitoring. It also helps us get us the context of the customer experience. What's the business impact of those problems?"
"It gives us visibility into the product and what we are doing operationally."
"On the Managed side tech support has been pretty good. Stuff gets turned around pretty quickly. With them being able to do the remote management from the back-end, they are able to fix stuff up if they need to."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"It needs a better way to figure out how to dig deeper into the details, e.g., sometimes we have to wade through multiple logs, etc."
"The new Managed Edition is too complex. I feel like a fish out of water."
"Product reporting still needs improvement."
"Two things that can be improved are the licensing and the Business dashboard."
"The dashboarding in Dynatrace is not very good. We have used other monitoring tools like AppDynamics. We are also using AppDynamics for some of our products. If I compare Dynatrace with those monitoring tools, the dashboarding is not as good. If I have to create a dashboard it takes me time, the experience is not that good."
"Make it easier to define applications. E.g., provide an API for applications defined by REST services."
"Improvements are needed in the navigation and timeframe selection when browsing problems."
"The dashboarding process and creating measures and metrics, it needs to be made a little bit easier and more simplified. "
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 16 reviews while TruView is ranked 53rd in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "Allows us to monitor application performance, underlying infrastructure, and relationships with Smartscape technology". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "Efficient monitoring, data visibility and easy overview of all data on a single view". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor and Zabbix.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.