We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."We were able to decrease the number of production defects ever since we started using Dynatrace in our test environment."
"The user experience allows us to be able to gauge customer experience and understand the performance impact of our platform."
"I think with Dynatrace, it has helped to bring value to the business because now we can speak using the same language."
"The real-user monitoring is mostly used to gauge the difference in performance for multitenant applications, This is so we can discern if there are any local network or client-facing issues when we do a comparison between each customer. It is quite important for us to be able to identify a client-side issue, as opposed to a feature managed problem, because we're essentially providing managed services of business applications."
"The PurePath stuff for deep dive analysis on problems. That is massive as far as having a benefit."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of application performance."
"This tool helps us gather information from all hosts and services, then cross reference the information."
"The linking is very good in Dynatrace. What happens in other monitoring tools is the linking is not proper. In those solutions, a person has to manually link many of the layers and what is happening in them, while in Dynatrace you get that from the very first visit. For example, if a person is visiting your website, from there it will traverse you to the end. If the application is a Java application, it will traverse you there, to the Method level. So that linking and traversing is better in Dynatrace."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"This solution needs better support for security and monolithic batch processes."
"Hard to use for beginners, to setup and explore."
"PurePath exports was a great feature in AppMon, but it is sometimes missing in Dynatrace."
"It is always requiring us to update the Dynatrace client."
"The solution is a bit pricey."
"This solution needs more powerful database monitoring capabilities."
"We would like the AI to produce more scientific data with less configuration."
"When compared with other tools, the experience needs improvement. I would like them to build out the interactions and make them friendlier."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 340 reviews while TruView is ranked 54th in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.