Enterasys Wireless WAN [EOL] vs HPE Wireless WAN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Enterasys Wireless WAN [EOL] and HPE Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN.
To learn more, read our detailed Wireless WAN Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I find the price to be reasonable."
  • "Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
  • "We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product."
  • "There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
  • "The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
  • "We have been satisfied with the price."
  • "The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
  • "Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."
  • More HPE Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The cost is based on the features offered in the product. According to the features that my institution wants, we selected the product. There is no need to make any payments on a yearly basis towards… more »
    Top Answer:Aruba has taken over HPE, and my institution is still evaluating HPE Wireless WAN. The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Wireless WAN
    8th
    out of 10 in Wireless WAN
    Views
    92
    Comparisons
    64
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    321
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    HPE Wireless WAN, a Software-Defined WAN dynamically selects the best path for each app based on policies and real-time network measurements. Flexibly and securely connect users to apps with higher visibility into vital traffic. WAN Portfolio include the following: HPE OfficeConnect OC20 802.11ac Series Access Points, HPE FlexNetwork MSR2000 Router Series, HPE FlexNetwork HSR6800 Router Series and HPE FlexNetwork VSR1000 Virtual Services Router Series.
    Sample Customers
    Louisiana College
    Bell Canada
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise27%
    Buyer's Guide
    Wireless WAN
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Enterasys Wireless WAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Wireless WAN while HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 16 reviews. Enterasys Wireless WAN [EOL] is rated 0.0, while HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". Enterasys Wireless WAN [EOL] is most compared with , whereas HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN.

    See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.