We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"The most valuable features are manufacturing, and manufacturing costing modules. These are all powerful features of Infor LN."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I like the tool’s multisite functionality."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"The solution is stable."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"The financials are great."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"The user interface is not very intuitive for newer users."
"From a technical perspective, LN needs to work on customization and integration. It's fairly expensive for many clients to migrate from a customized private solution to the cloud. Infor needs to improve the cloud solution to make the migration from the on-prem customized solution faster and smoother. Otherwise, many clients will find it difficult or expensive to do."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is more of a legacy solution because most of the competitors are or have moved to the cloud. It would be beneficial if there was a cloud version available. Additionally, the interface could improve."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Infor LX and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.