We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."LN is definitely a stable product. It's number one on Gartner's four quadrants."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"It's fast, predicts well, and is basically the best tool in the market for the automotive industry and network planning projects."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"The product can scale."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"From a technical perspective, LN needs to work on customization and integration. It's fairly expensive for many clients to migrate from a customized private solution to the cloud. Infor needs to improve the cloud solution to make the migration from the on-prem customized solution faster and smoother. Otherwise, many clients will find it difficult or expensive to do."
"Infor LN has customer support in India, but service could be improved. So, basically, they prioritize agreements, and the number of tickets closed within a certain timeframe, not necessarily the quality or resolution of the tickets themselves. They just open and close them, sometimes without even understanding the issue. That's the biggest problem."
"The user interface is not very intuitive for newer users."
"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor M3. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.