We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"The solution can scale."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"When you have a bug in the system, you get some kind of alert. They should explain those alerts more."
"I would like to see the CRM improved. I would also like to see a supply chain management feature."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"It's not that intuitive."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."
"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor M3. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.