We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"The best feature of this solution, is that it provides businesses with a way to see information from across different process streams, in one place via dashboards."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"I like the tool’s multisite functionality."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"The most valuable features are manufacturing, and manufacturing costing modules. These are all powerful features of Infor LN."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"A stable and solid product."
"The solution can scale."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"Infor LN has customer support in India, but service could be improved. So, basically, they prioritize agreements, and the number of tickets closed within a certain timeframe, not necessarily the quality or resolution of the tickets themselves. They just open and close them, sometimes without even understanding the issue. That's the biggest problem."
"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Infor LX and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.