We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about Infor LN is that you can use it for inter-company business and for international businesses, especially by mid-sized and big companies."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"LN is definitely a stable product. It's number one on Gartner's four quadrants."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."
"The initial setup is easy."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"There are numerous good features."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"Infor LN has customer support in India, but service could be improved. So, basically, they prioritize agreements, and the number of tickets closed within a certain timeframe, not necessarily the quality or resolution of the tickets themselves. They just open and close them, sometimes without even understanding the issue. That's the biggest problem."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"The finance model within this solution does not have very strong reporting functionality, which I would like to see improved."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"When you have a bug in the system, you get some kind of alert. They should explain those alerts more."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
"EnterpriseOne's integration could be improved."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Infor LX and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.