We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the tool’s multisite functionality."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"Most of them who use Infor LN have add-ons connected to ERP. It's either a supplier exchange, or they've got sales problems that are integrated with it."
"It's fast, predicts well, and is basically the best tool in the market for the automotive industry and network planning projects."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"The best thing about Infor LN is that you can use it for inter-company business and for international businesses, especially by mid-sized and big companies."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"A stable and solid product."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"The financials are great."
"The product can scale."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"When it comes to planning, it's more challenging to consider the entire structure, such as having a specific SKU and wanting to look at the planning for the whole structure. You must delve into individual item details to plan for it with order planning. Therefore, improvements will allow more comprehensive planning for each SKU."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"The user interface is not very intuitive for newer users."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"I would like to see the CRM improved. I would also like to see a supply chain management feature."
"The finance model within this solution does not have very strong reporting functionality, which I would like to see improved."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"The implementation procedure could be simplified."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"EnterpriseOne's integration could be improved."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor M3. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.