We performed a comparison between Infor LN and Microsoft Dynamics AX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Most of them who use Infor LN have add-ons connected to ERP. It's either a supplier exchange, or they've got sales problems that are integrated with it."
"It's not too hard to handle the initial setup."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."
"It's fast, predicts well, and is basically the best tool in the market for the automotive industry and network planning projects."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality."
"We're using the solution for financial modules, specifically focusing on consolidation, financial configuration, management reporting for warehousing, sales. Most of the features of Microsoft Dynamics AX are good. The overall structure and functions are great. The solution is stable. The initial setup is straightforward."
"It was an okay solution when we delivered hardware and we had to do maintenance."
"The most valuable feature is the workflow of the modules."
"In terms of features, GP offers a wide range of strong capabilities, particularly in the financial module."
"Microsoft Dynamics is very stable."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Dynamics AX are ease of use and performance."
"I like that it's a complete ERP solution from production level to branch level."
"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"When it comes to planning, it's more challenging to consider the entire structure, such as having a specific SKU and wanting to look at the planning for the whole structure. You must delve into individual item details to plan for it with order planning. Therefore, improvements will allow more comprehensive planning for each SKU."
"When you have a bug in the system, you get some kind of alert. They should explain those alerts more."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"It's not that intuitive."
"There is no Arabic interface in Microsoft Business Central, which is a big weak point."
"The support here in Turkey could be better. However, the international support is good."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX can improve by having a more modern user interface. It should be more modular and dynamic. Additionally, the solution could be easier to connect with APIs with other technologies."
"The product needs better admin control. There is room for improvement in flexibility, reporting, and dashboards. Artificial intelligence should be incorporated. I have concerns regarding partners, specifically in the implementation and deployment of Microsoft Dynamics."
"There is room for improvement when handling various currencies within the current Microsoft Dynamics AX system."
"From a consultant's point of view, I recommend an enhancement in terms of detailed documentation for the products on the website."
"The older version of Microsoft Dynamics AX that we are using is not as scalable as the newer version."
"It needs better financials and reporting from the system, not through Excel."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 51 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and IFS Cloud Platform. See our Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.