We performed a comparison between Evolven and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics."It facilitates infrastructure readiness and consistency."
"It provides visualization of risk levels."
"End-user Synthetics and monitoring are very good."
"We are able to drill down and see what is going on in the system."
"The product allows the developer to see the actual problems in the applications."
"The service maps that it creates, the health maps that it creates, the insights that it provides, etc., are all quite useful."
"Sometimes, I monitor the user's time of response and use this information to improve the number of servers on the back-end. Or, I can use it to change my back log for front-end developers and improve their response times. It's very important in this case because I can improve the experience of the final user."
"The most valuable feature is the New Relic APM module to deep-dive into the application, to get bottlenecks to the surface, and to improve application performance. Also, the New Relic Insights module creates a real-time dashboard on application performance to create awareness for the DevOps team."
"One valuable feature is that the synthetic alert stays open until the issue is resolved. You can actually monitor whether your system is back up."
"It gives insights to non-technical people about what technical issues are most important, how much it impacts customers, and potentially, where we should be targeting our development teams when they have time."
"Alerting needs improvement."
"New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better."
"They need to improve the alerting and dashboarding as these are the key features in DevOps."
"I haven't come across any features that are lacking."
"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."
"There are certain features that are not supported in New Relic, such as CATSEARCH, which allows you to do a full-text search."
"There has been some problem with the agent, and it is just not working well. It is not able to record information with the application server. They have been able to fix the issue, but it took quite a long time. This is the main issue in the APM products and also in New Relic. The mobile application monitoring has been pretty difficult to set up and also quite expensive. It should be a little bit easier and cheaper. Because it is pretty difficult and expensive, many customers don't take it."
"They don't have an opportunity to share the dashboard with the public. If you want to share it with stakeholders or people outside the organization who just want to have a look at a couple of metrics, you can't do that without onboarding them to the product itself."
"There were some settings we had issues with."
Earn 20 points
Evolven is ranked 16th in IT Operations Analytics while New Relic is ranked 2nd in IT Operations Analytics with 151 reviews. Evolven is rated 7.0, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Evolven writes "Provides visualization of risk levels. However, alerting needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Evolven is most compared with , whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Azure Monitor.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
