We performed a comparison between Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgate, Fortinet, OPNsense and others in Firewalls."I am "headache free" that I don't have to categorize all the websites and that security has been pre categorized by the people, and that the services are getting updated. At least one part of my problem is over."
"Web filtering and two-factor authentication are great features."
"Its performance in fulfilling our requirements has been satisfactory."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"It's very easy to set up, it's very easy to make policies and, for an organization, that means you don't need IT expert in firewalls. You just need to have somebody who knows a little bit of IT, and that's it. With other products, you need someone with a "Masters" degree in firewalls."
"The most valuable feature is the FortiManager for centralized management."
"What's most important is the ease of use."
"It's quite comfortable to handle the FortiGate firewall."
"The solution is stable, inexpensive, and works well for medium size companies."
"vSRX is easy to deploy to any virtual infrastructure, such as OpenStack, VMware, and even Docker (cSRX)."
"It's easily scalable."
"The most valuable feature is robustness."
"The high availability of the application is good."
"We think they have a good interface, the operating system is good, it's robust. It has plenty of great features, and the relation between the cost and benefits works for our business."
"It protects from distributed denial-of-service attacks with Screen Options."
"Technical support has been quite helpful."
"The solution can scale."
"The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."
"The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."
"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email."
"The installation phase was easy."
"Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats."
"Some of the filtering is not robust, you can escape it with a VPN. Some of the users bypass some of the filters. It catches some but it also misses some, that area could be improved. It's functioning reasonably but there's room for improvement in that area."
"The way everything is set up could be easier. Currently, people need a lot of experience and knowledge to administer it and to link it to devices."
"The support we receive when we need to upgrade is not satisfactory and has room for improvement."
"They have to just improve its performance when we enable all UTM features. When you enable all the features, the performance of FortiGate, as well as of Sophos and SonicWall, goes down."
"Scalability is one of the disadvantages. When it comes to scalability, you have to actually change the box. If you want to upgrade it, you need to actually change the existing box and probably you take the system off to other sites."
"One area for improvement is the performance on the bandwidth demands for smaller devices, as well as better web filtering."
"The user interface could be improved to make it less confusing and easier to set up."
"Lacks sufficient security options."
"We tried configuring the IDS for more than four months, but it did not work properly."
"Third-party support for Juniper is a lot less than Cisco. This is no surprise, but a definite consideration if you are expecting to use a lot of third party support. In my guesstimate, for every 100 Cisco shops, you will find one Juniper shop."
"There are a lot of features that customers do not know about and I think that better documentation would help when it comes to learning how to use the product."
"The pricing strategy of the vendor could improve."
"The GUI needs to be easier to handle."
"It did not improve our safety because the IDS does not detect some attacks, but our anti-virus software did."
"It would be ideal if the solution could use cloud services to help update signatures or threat prevention systems."
"The Juniper SRX product needs to improve in terms of innovation."
"Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization."
"We'd like the potential for better scaling."
"It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."
"I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."
"Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
"It is not a very secure product."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 19th in Firewalls with 86 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 14th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 35 reviews. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Highly scalable, user-friendly UI, and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks ". Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Check Point NGFW, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Secure Firewall and NetWitness Platform.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.