We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management."The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"The product gives us as much control as we can have by providing a complete picture of the whole set of Oracle products."
"It is the best monitoring tool for Oracle databases."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"The most valuable feature is high availability."
"It works best with Oracle."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions like Oracle Data Guard, especially for Oracle-to-non-Oracle replication scenarios."
"You can use Oracle GoldenGate as a DR for your system."
"I like that the product transforms data and provides real-time applications."
"GoldenGate enables us to merge and transform data from various sources in real time. It's a powerful tool that can read and load most data sources."
"The live application feature is most valuable. The solution is stable. I rate it a seven out of ten."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It's very simple to configure, it's very simple to implement. In addition, the ability it has to capture data and transmit it with incredible speed is better than any of the product out there. It's extremely powerful."
"The solution's agents work with Java, and the Java code sometimes consumes a lot of memory on the CPU."
"In my experience, the monitoring could be improved."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"We would like to have a single dashboard for monitoring and controlling all of our products."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"The fact that Oracle Enterprise Manager is an expensive solution is a matter of concern and needs to be considered for improvement."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"Monitoring must be a bit more enhanced."
"The GoldenGate license is very costly."
"The process of transforming the data between two different databases is inefficient and needs to be improved."
"I would like to see the interface more graphical and easier to use."
"The solution needs to improve its latency, monitoring and support."
"Oracle GoldenGate can enhance its functionality by enabling the merging of multiple migrations into one."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 122 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and AppDynamics, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI).
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.