Agile Manager [EOL] vs PTC Integrity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
views| comparisons
86% willing to recommend
PTC Logo
2,745 views|2,150 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and PTC Integrity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."

More Agile Manager [EOL] Pros →

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.""The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.""We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.""The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions.""I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn.""Complete traceability as per process requirements.""PTC Integrity has good stability.""I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

More PTC Integrity Pros →

Cons
"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."

More Agile Manager [EOL] Cons →

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.""It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.""To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.""I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.""From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times.""There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.""The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields.""For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

More PTC Integrity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their… more »
Top Answer:The product is expensive. They should improve the pricing.
Top Answer:The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Views
2,745
Comparisons
2,150
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
218
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager
MKS
Learn More
Overview

Agile project management solution to plan, execute and track Agile projects. Agile teams can improve Release Planning, Sprint Planning, Sprint Execution, and gain more Visibility and Insight into Agile projects using SaaS or on-premise deployment.

Key Features include: Release and User Story and Defect Management, Development Tools Integration, Team/Resource Management, Rest APIs, Micro Focus ALM/QC/PPM Synchronizer, Regular releases driven by user feedback, Modern, clean, intuitive UI and SAFeTM Gold Certified.

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Sample Customers
Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens
TRW Automotive
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Pharma/Biotech Company22%
Retailer11%
Logistics Company11%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company42%
Manufacturing Company25%
Aerospace/Defense Firm17%
Engineering Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company25%
Computer Software Company16%
Healthcare Company8%
Transportation Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise80%
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Agile Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while PTC Integrity is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 12 reviews. Agile Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while PTC Integrity is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Agile Manager [EOL] writes "We have the ability to define common standard procedures and methodologies. I'm looking for better integration using Octane". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation". Agile Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with Codebeamer, Polarion ALM, Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps and IBM Rational ALM.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.