We performed a comparison between HPE Eucalyptus and Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."
"From a performance perspective, the management capabilities of the product are very valuable to its customers."
"Another feature is the Resource Manager, where we can manage the consumption of resources of certain queries, separately in resource groups. Depending on the characteristics of the query, queries can be placed in groups that consume less database and hardware resources."
"It is easier to manage your Oracle Database backups and create email alerts regarding the status of your backups (Succeeded or Failed)."
"Using Enterprise Manager, I was able to create user profiles for all the instances that have the same profile. Secondly, it's easier to manage performance, to automate the AWR reports to run every half an hour, or hour. Then, if you have a performance issue you just open the report and you can see what was running the last one hour, the SQL statements, or what was causing the performance issues."
"The capability to manage incidents, monitor agent statuses, and address performance issues is highly valuable."
"You can create a system group (database, application, and web server), so you can monitor performance as a system."
"It is a highly stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The dashboard and reporting help us to do preventative AI and analytics to detect performance bottlenecks."
"The customization should be improved."
"It's crucial to promptly resolve agent-related issues to ensure continuous and accurate monitoring of database features within the Oracle Enterprise Manager."
"You cannot use Enterprise Manager as replacement for a WebLogic console."
"The installation steps are very complex and the documentation for them is very generic and does not make very clear the correct steps from the installation to the addition of the host and database."
"Oracle Data Guard monitoring: There are no alerts for redo log transport failure."
"There is a lot of information required to deal with the vulnerabilities in the product on a timely basis, for which the documentation part is not available."
"Adding new databases is difficult in Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control."
"There is a lack from the point of view of monitoring on the system. The performance of the system and its resources are things that I think can be improved. There needs to be real-time monitoring available on the solution."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control needs to monitor other Oracle tools as well. It should also improve its pricing."
More Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is ranked 16th in Cloud Management with 34 reviews. HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0, while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control writes "A robust product to deal with application performance enhancemen". HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is most compared with AWS Control Tower, IBM Turbonomic and VMware Aria Operations.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
