We performed a comparison between HPE Eucalyptus and Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."
"The valuable feature is job scheduling. It manages the database's scheduling, history, and growth, helping monitor CPU and space usage across the entire data center. It provides a comprehensive view of operations."
"The capability to manage incidents, monitor agent statuses, and address performance issues is highly valuable."
"You can create a system group (database, application, and web server), so you can monitor performance as a system."
"If you're using Oracle products, you should definitely use Oracle Enterprise Manager because it is central to product management."
"The dashboard and reporting help us to do preventative AI and analytics to detect performance bottlenecks."
"From a performance perspective, the management capabilities of the product are very valuable to its customers."
"Of course, that you can manage and create the backup strategies from a central environment for all your environments, so you don’t have to do so on each database. You can set up the policy you want for each database, but you do it from a central environment."
"Advisors provide quick access to Insight and best practice information for performance tuning and configuration."
"The customization should be improved."
"When registering a host, only if your host is running Linux will you get all the information which is available on EM. It would be nice if in future releases to include IBM AIX (primarily) and Microsoft Windows (secondly)."
"You cannot use Enterprise Manager as replacement for a WebLogic console."
"It is sometimes difficult to create configurations in Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control."
"There is a lot of information required to deal with the vulnerabilities in the product on a timely basis, for which the documentation part is not available."
"The response time of the solution's technical support team is too long and should be improved."
"The installation steps are very complex and the documentation for them is very generic and does not make very clear the correct steps from the installation to the addition of the host and database."
"The product does have room for improvement in patch management."
"It's crucial to promptly resolve agent-related issues to ensure continuous and accurate monitoring of database features within the Oracle Enterprise Manager."
More Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is ranked 16th in Cloud Management with 34 reviews. HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0, while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control writes "A robust product to deal with application performance enhancemen". HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is most compared with AWS Control Tower, VMware Aria Operations and IBM Turbonomic.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.