We performed a comparison between OpenText Service Manager and Zendesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Help Desk Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to scale."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution will streamline productivity and also improve automation. That would bring efficiency as well the ability to handle a big number of enterprise-wide service needs. Productivity and collaborative capabilities are some of the key benefits."
"It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents."
"It gives us better understanding and control of service management."
"The design has been revamped in terms of GUI. The current interface is quite easy to read."
"We can have all our requests and incidents registered in one system."
"It can adapt to any process in the organization."
"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."
"It's a very stable tool, very powerful."
"The product offers very good management. It has a great ability to assign tickets based on content."
"Zendesk Support has a lot of good APIs."
"What is cool about Zendesk Guide is how it works together with others Zendesk products. Especially with support and with the analytics. Put those together for a small or medium-sized company and it's a really powerful tool."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It's very convenient to use."
"The stability has been very good."
"With the new version moving toward the codeless configuration is good, but it's losing flexibility."
"It needs to be easier to use for the end users because one problem we had was that we are handling different kinds of cases."
"Their end-user interface and technical support features could be improved."
"The product's technical support services need improvement."
"It needs good integration with the configuration database, that's lacking at the moment, It's not that good."
"The user interface is very clunky. It's only now beginning to be a web-based interface, but for now it's still very clunky."
"There's a lot of manual work, which is error prone and time consuming, in how the code gets transported from one system to the other."
"I don't see anything lacking."
"It wasn't easy to set up so we're only using a third of all of the features,"
"Zendesk Guide could be improved by allowing us to put our assets in one location. What happens now for each article, for example, is we have to upload the images for that article to that location, so the image reuse is still not something that they have perfected. If they could allow us to update all the images in one location, and then pull the image from there, it would be easier when working on Multibrand projects. There are no Multibrand updates available—we have to update each brand manually. For my company, I have come up with an API tool which allows me to push the content to multiple brands together, but if you don't have something like that, you have to manually do it."
"As per me, there arent much significant issues or areas for improvement with Zendesk, as my usage of it is limited. I appreciate its ability to organize tickets effectively based on tags, allowing me to easily gather and analyze customer feedback and requests."
"The solution itself wasn't easy to set up."
"Zendesk Guide's customization could be improved. I would like it to be easier and maybe open-sourced, so that if you have a developer in your company, you can do it yourself. Right now, that isn't allowed, so you need to have it done via the integrator. Another improvement—this is nit-picking—is that it could be less easy to make changes. Some things are so easy that they sometimes look a little amateur-ish. Most of the templates are built-in so they can be used directly, so they are very simple."
"The dashboard could be better."
"One of the drawbacks of Zendesk is that it doesn't provide a secure way for us to send data. So, we usually use a secure SharePoint folder link. We put that in the Zendesk ticket so that the requester has a secure way of getting to their data."
"Sometimes if there was a way to just flag the actual issue out of those email chains - that would be really helpful."
OpenText Service Manager is ranked 16th in Help Desk Software with 48 reviews while Zendesk is ranked 10th in Help Desk Software with 57 reviews. OpenText Service Manager is rated 7.2, while Zendesk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Service Manager writes "Excellent pricing with great change management and service management capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zendesk writes "Straightforward, very transparent, and very well organized". OpenText Service Manager is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, BMC Helix ITSM, OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) and IBM Maximo, whereas Zendesk is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Atlassian Confluence, Freshservice and Microsoft Dynamics CRM. See our OpenText Service Manager vs. Zendesk report.
See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors and best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.
We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.