We performed a comparison between OpenText Service Manager and Zendesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Help Desk Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can have all our requests and incidents registered in one system."
"It's easy to scale."
"The workflow engine that standardizes and globalizes the process steps. It drives people through the process by standardization and automation."
"Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013."
"A valuable feature for us is that we have an ordered way to handle all the cases that we can handle with the infrastructure."
"Service Manager does what it should, but it's quite outdated."
"Service Manager's best features are flexibility and customizability."
"Sometimes, customization is simple. The version we are using now has a nice interface."
"The most valuable features of Zendesk Support are collaboration, reports, and a self-service portal. The customer and team can see all the information needed from the portal."
"Its agility and simplicity are the most valuable features. This tool is very user-friendly."
"The stability has been very good."
"It's a very stable tool, very powerful."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It's very convenient to use."
"It has good management, the ability to sign tickets based on content, the multi-channel support, the self service portal, the integration with Salesforce, the setup process, and the product features as we are currently using them."
"One of the most valuable features is the ease of use. If you take the standalone product, it is so easy to use, but if you want a tailor-made Zendesk Guide, you can't do it yourself. However, you can use a template that already exists—they have a lot, and they're very cheap, around 300-400 euros—and use it on all your brands. It's a very easy product to use."
"Pure cloud-based native functionality is lacking."
"It needs good integration with the configuration database, that's lacking at the moment, It's not that good."
"Micro Focus Service Manager is not very great. It would be better if it had more features. When it comes to features, BMC tops the chart. When it comes to usage, people use BMC more."
"Customization can be difficult at times because scripting is often required."
"The interface could be better."
"It needs to be easier to use for the end users because one problem we had was that we are handling different kinds of cases."
"There's a lot of manual work, which is error prone and time consuming, in how the code gets transported from one system to the other."
"I don't see anything lacking."
"The price of the solution should be reduced."
"Zendesk Guide could be improved by allowing us to put our assets in one location. What happens now for each article, for example, is we have to upload the images for that article to that location, so the image reuse is still not something that they have perfected. If they could allow us to update all the images in one location, and then pull the image from there, it would be easier when working on Multibrand projects. There are no Multibrand updates available—we have to update each brand manually. For my company, I have come up with an API tool which allows me to push the content to multiple brands together, but if you don't have something like that, you have to manually do it."
"If I write an article, and I have a team of 30 people, and they all have a Zendesk account, when I write an article, I send them an email. "Hey guys, I just wrote this article. It's one of the most popular topics this month on which we are not covered. Please check it and make sure that you include it in your resolutions". The issue is, once I send it to those 30 people, and they open it, the next morning, that article is the most popular article."
"The solution could integrate better with QR codes from some websites such as Facebook."
"As per me, there arent much significant issues or areas for improvement with Zendesk, as my usage of it is limited. I appreciate its ability to organize tickets effectively based on tags, allowing me to easily gather and analyze customer feedback and requests."
"The solution itself wasn't easy to set up."
"The support team is time-consuming, and they don't find the answer to our problem."
"They have something called Zendesk Explore, which isn't as good as what they had in place previously."
OpenText Service Manager is ranked 16th in Help Desk Software with 48 reviews while Zendesk is ranked 10th in Help Desk Software with 57 reviews. OpenText Service Manager is rated 7.2, while Zendesk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Service Manager writes "Excellent pricing with great change management and service management capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zendesk writes "Straightforward, very transparent, and very well organized". OpenText Service Manager is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, BMC Helix ITSM, OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX) and IBM Maximo, whereas Zendesk is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Atlassian Confluence, Freshservice and Microsoft Dynamics CRM. See our OpenText Service Manager vs. Zendesk report.
See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors and best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.
We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.