We performed a comparison between HPE StoreOnce and NetApp FAS Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Deduplication Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution saves a lot of storage capacity."
"I'm impressed with their support structure, call availability, understanding, flexibility in scheduling remote sessions, and accommodating customer timeframes."
"The solution is stable."
"The implementation is straightforward."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its catalyst mode, along with better performance, backup, and recovery."
"The most valuable feature of HPE StoreOnce is the virtual drive."
"Has very good deduplication and encryption features."
"It has a very good implementation of the Active Directory services, so implementation into a Windows network is easy."
"The tool's most valuable features are ease of use, ease of access, expandability, availability, and performance. NVMe drives have improved their performance."
"Can use both SAN and NAS at the same time."
"Flexible and reliable storage solution with multiple features such as cloning, replication, and deduplication. Data migration can be done without any performance implications on the production systems."
"Fast Snapshots"
"NetApp FAS Series is simple to set up."
"I have found all the features useful in NetApp FAS Series."
"The most valuable features are compression and dedupe."
"We're outsourced with a partner who recalls a larger amount of problems with the stability of the product."
"Hardware maintenance involves some downtime for backup destination storage which can be a problem for some."
"The solution's technical support should be faster."
"HPE StoreOnce could improve the capacity support."
"HPE StoreOnce needs to provide a SaaS solution by offering high-density disks."
"The solution should continue to refine its integration capabilities. I also see they are starting to use cloud integration as well, which is good, but they should do more to integrate with it."
"The solution could always be less expensive."
"We would like to see some improvements in the Veeam Backup & Replication integration. It's good, but it has a lot of room to improve. In particular around the inability to easily move data between StoreOnce appliances."
"The user interface could be improved."
"Dedicated storage efficiency accelerators could improve the overall performance of the system."
"Currently, the newest release is not HCI friendly."
"The solution's configuration is not flexible."
"Technical support needs to be improved, as there are no longer partners in our country."
"Cost is always a factor. Some people choose EMC or Dell because they perceive NetApp as being more expensive."
"Interfacing with the cloud environment could be better. I want to be able to move some cloud volume and integrate it seamlessly with my home on-premise storage. Sometimes I have issues with port permissions. NetApp probably needs to improve more on the integration side from on-premise to the cloud."
"Needs to add wizards for newer, inexperienced users."
HPE StoreOnce is ranked 2nd in Deduplication Software with 102 reviews while NetApp FAS Series is ranked 5th in Deduplication Software with 98 reviews. HPE StoreOnce is rated 8.4, while NetApp FAS Series is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE StoreOnce writes "Helps to consolidate D2D backups and has a good deduplication ratio". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp FAS Series writes "Offers good performance and ". HPE StoreOnce is most compared with Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Dell PowerVault, ExaGrid EX Series, DD Boost and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, whereas NetApp FAS Series is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp AFF, HPE StorageWorks MSA, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform. See our HPE StoreOnce vs. NetApp FAS Series report.
See our list of best Deduplication Software vendors.
We monitor all Deduplication Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.