We performed a comparison between IIS and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."It is an easy-to-use and secure program."
"The tool is very easy to use and efficient."
"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."
"We use Windows Server only for Eggplant Manager."
"The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools."
"The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It's very easy to publish."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"In the next release, the tool should be more easily integrated and configured with other provisions. The pricing should also be made cheaper since it's very expensive now."
"IIS could improve by having some features related to ASR and HTTPS certificate generation."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment."
"IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this."
"I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"Having no support for other than a Microsoft environment and programming languages limits the usage of IIS in many cases."
"The scalability depends on how you have set it up. If you're running IIS on a single server, it might not be as capable as if you are on many in a cluster or with load balancing and so on."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. IIS is rated 8.0, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and JBoss, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
