We performed a comparison between ITRS Geneos and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."
"The built-in plug-ins allow administrators to easily configure monitoring components for market data systems such as Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform and SRLabs Wombat (formerly NYSE)."
"The solution is used across the entire investment banking division, covering environments such as electronic trading, algo-trading, fixed income, FX, etc. It monitors that environment and enables a bank to significantly reduce down time. Although hard to measure, since implementation, we have probably seen some increased stability because of it and we have definitely seen teams a lot more aware of their environment. Consequently, we can be more proactive in challenging and improving previously undetected weaknesses."
"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."
"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."
"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."
"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."
"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."
"There is less computing power needed for scaling."
"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."
"The level of discovery-based configuration that lets us auto-configure the monitoring for various systems is a valuable feature."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"Zabbix is scalable."
"It meets my organizational needs. It's pretty easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"The most valuable feature is the alert and alarm monitoring."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."
"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."
"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages."
"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."
"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."
"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."
"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."
"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."
"Zabbix can use better documentation and support for troubleshooting."
"The product could be more secure and more stable."
"If Zabbix had a better dashboard then it would be nice."
"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."
"In an upcoming release, there should be automated reports which we are currently doing manually. For example, if we collect a report file every day and want to send it to a moderator for review. We are expecting this feature to come out soon but it would be valuable to have now."
"There are a lot of areas for improvement, specifically in the dashboards and reports functionalities."
"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."
"I had problems using Zabbix when working with SUSE Enterprise; many companies use SUSE."
Earn 20 points
ITRS Geneos is ranked 10th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 10 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 9th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 25 reviews. ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "A stable solution, with real-time monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Very mature, easy to scale, and free to use". ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana and Prometheus, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core. See our ITRS Geneos vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.