We performed a comparison between QlikView and TIBCO Jaspersoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Reporting solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution has simplified getting to and understanding our data, no matter where it is housed."
"The search feature: ability to see the related data."
"You can switch views easily."
"It's incredibly fast and can handle large volumes of data without slowing down our operations."
"On the positive side, QlikView's scripting is a great asset as it functions as an ETL."
"E-T-L, The Extract, Transform, and Loading capabilities of QlikView make it a highly sophisticated self-service business intelligence tool for developers and analysts."
"The scalability is there."
"The language support is very good."
"We find the access restrictions on different user groups valuable."
"The growth time is the most valuable feature of TIBCO Jaspersoft."
"We can set any property dynamically."
"With the online view, it's easier to create Ad Hoc reports. It has inbuilt reports so we can easily get data from the system and customize the fields."
"You can do quite a lot with it in terms of automated reports and dashboards."
"The designer is the most valuable feature."
"The feature that I like most is the drag and drop capability."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...The deployment process of TIBCO Jaspersoft is easy."
"I would want them to have more options as a user. It would be nice for them to create their own dashboards and add fields."
"The solution should be mobile-responsive. It should also include drag-and-drop and slice-and-dice features."
"Syntax editor needs some work, it's frustrating to have valid syntax being flagged as incorrect."
"Although Qliktech's road map clearly states that QlikView has a long way to go, most of the R&D effort seems to be benefiting Qlik Sense."
"There is a challenge on the frontend when it comes to browsing data through QlikView, as it isn't entirely compatible with other platforms we use."
"Sometimes, dealing with complex reports requires more effort, which could be really improved."
"Installation and deployment could be made easier and quicker."
"QlikView certainly lacks in its ability to share visualizations or create visualizations easily."
"The stability of TIBCO Jaspersoft needs improvement."
"A better focus should be put on self-service reporting."
"The upgrades are not easy."
"I would like to see some analysis done prior to data extraction. The data extraction itself could also be improved."
"There might be some compatibility issues with the dashboard if we're using the latest version and some clients are using the older version. Some features might not be supported."
"We'd like to see the community version offer a little bit more support and better documentation and we'd like the enterprise edition to have better pricing."
"The reporting templates have room for improvement."
"I would like to see better support for big data."
QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews while TIBCO Jaspersoft is ranked 7th in Reporting with 28 reviews. QlikView is rated 8.2, while TIBCO Jaspersoft is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Jaspersoft writes "Provides a LMS reporting system and inbuilt reports so we can easily get data from the system and customize fields". QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and TIBCO Spotfire, whereas TIBCO Jaspersoft is most compared with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, SAP Crystal Reports, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau and IBM Cognos. See our QlikView vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft report.
See our list of best Reporting vendors and best Embedded BI vendors.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.