We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Activity Based Costing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"The financials are great."
"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible."
"It’s a stable product."
"I think one of the best use cases is centralizing supplier and customer data into our finance system. We identified there were so many duplicate suppliers and customers and so a lot of time was spent reporting."
"Order to cash and procure to pay process: They are valuable features because of their integration and flexibility."
"The technical ability to run runtime APIs is great."
"Very flexible in terms of configurations and it's capable of integrations."
"It is scalable."
"The most valuable features of Oracle E-Business Suite are all the 15 to 20 modules. We use them on a day-to-day basis."
"It was very easy to integrate the product into our existing infrastructure."
"The new Subledger Accounting feature is very strong."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"We don't like Oracle EBS because it is very old. Nowadays, all the systems are on the cloud and web-based. With Oracle EBS, you need a huge setup before installing it. You need a lot of servers. There are a lot of problems and bugs in the system. We have to move from Oracle EBS to another system. In terms of improvements, it can have better training for end users and better support."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Movement of CIP Inventory cannot be monitored in Inventory module when we are using the CIP Account or movement of CIP Inventory in Asset module, which is not flexible like Inventory module."
"Oracle E-Business Suite is a bit outdated because it's been developed more than ten years ago, and this is an area for improvement. My team is still getting used to the solution, so there could still be some features that have not been enabled or features my team isn't aware of yet. There have been issues with the Treasury module of Oracle E-Business Suite, so this is another area for improvement. My company hasn't decided yet on whether to implement the Treasury module or just go with another solution. Another room for improvement in Oracle E-Business Suite is the design, as it needs to be optimized based on usage patterns. What I'd like added in the next release of Oracle E-Business Suite is the time attribute. The solution still has dashboards being rolled out, so the time attribute could already be there or is still in the process of implementation. I also didn't find much use for the Projects module based on my company's requirements. The integration of Oracle E-Business Suite with the rest of the Oracle tools isn't very tight as well, but it could be because of customizations here in India, where the integrations work seamlessly everywhere, except in India. You'll find gaps because of customizations in India which are very, very irritating. For example, if a procurement is moving in the system then all the data has to move from one module to the other, but in the Oracle E-Business Suite Procurement module, you'll notice breaks or gaps that require you to manually transfer that data, so I'd like this improved in the next release of the solution."
"Improving the reporting and user interface of Oracle ERP would be beneficial and is something that can be considered for future updates."
"Oracle E-Business Suite could improve the tables. When we remove some of them sometimes they cloud the modules into one. It becomes a little difficult to segregate."
"There are some business-specific processes still not implemented."
"The implementation can take quite a bit of time."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 3rd in Activity Based Costing Software with 55 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 1st in Activity Based Costing Software with 141 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and PeopleSoft, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP S/4HANA, NetSuite ERP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors and best ERP vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.