We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Activity Based Costing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are numerous good features."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"The product has been stable so far."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"The solution is stable."
"Its drag-and-drop features make data distribution a breeze."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between accounts receivable, accounts payable, general ledger, and budgeting."
"Really scalable business application suite with good technical support and straightforward patching."
"Oracle E-Business Suite improves forecast accuracy, reduces costs, and increases manufacturing capacity."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle E-Business Suite is the customization."
"The most valuable features of Oracle E-Business Suite are all the 15 to 20 modules. We use them on a day-to-day basis."
"The customer gets a better cost calculation and an integrated system between departments."
"The technical support for the solution was very good."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"The product’s pricing should be improved."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"I would rate the support for Oracle E-Business Suite a four out of five."
"The EBS Design to some extent is still monolithic."
"The initial setup was a little complex."
"The operations could be better, specifically for manufacturing processes."
"Oracle E-Business Suite could improve the tables. When we remove some of them sometimes they cloud the modules into one. It becomes a little difficult to segregate."
"It's difficult for some customers to understand in the beginning. A user really has to understand the processes."
"It requires training before you can easily use this product, so it should be easier to use."
"Oracle E-Business Suite's stability could be improved as they have a lot of bugs that need to be fixed."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 3rd in Activity Based Costing Software with 55 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 1st in Activity Based Costing Software with 141 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and PeopleSoft, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and Microsoft Dynamics AX. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors and best ERP vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.