We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Activity Based Costing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible."
"The solution can scale."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The technical ability to run runtime APIs is great."
"Very flexible in terms of configurations and it's capable of integrations."
"There is essentially one solution for every industry within Oracle — you won't require a third-party solution."
"The most valuable features of Oracle E-Business Suite are all the 15 to 20 modules. We use them on a day-to-day basis."
"It's a scalable product."
"It's highly customizable."
"It is a solution for GFMIS (Governmental Fiscal Management Information Systems)."
"It makes financial operations easier to perform."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is more of a legacy solution because most of the competitors are or have moved to the cloud. It would be beneficial if there was a cloud version available. Additionally, the interface could improve."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"The implementation procedure could be simplified."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"We expect Oracle to go into continuous innovation mode and provide simplified integration solutions."
"It would be great to see Oracle E-Business Suite become less dependent on the SAO solution, which is an integration solution for Oracle platforms."
"The solution needs to be updated with modern technology as it currently runs on the Java platform, JWE, which is obsolete and requires you to need an API supported browser."
"Some of my clients report that the overall ease of use could be simplified."
"A downside of Oracle E-Business Suite is its interface because it's less user-friendly than the latest cloud solutions. As an organization, Oracle now has more interest in cloud applications, so nowadays, it doesn't focus much on Oracle E-Business Suite, an on-premises solution, so this is another downside."
"I would say the integration needs improvement. Oracle needs to work on the integration layer to make the solution much more robust and modern."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"Oracle has improved a lot because Oracle E-Business Suite is quite outdated. Oracle built the Oracle Fusion platform and it has many improved processes. We registered a few enhancements requests, but it's a very long bureaucratic process with Oracle. It doesn't make any sense to communicate with Oracle about what changes should be made to the system."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 3rd in Activity Based Costing Software with 55 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 1st in Activity Based Costing Software with 141 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and PeopleSoft, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and Microsoft Dynamics AX. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors and best ERP vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.