We performed a comparison between LocalDB and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is very straightforward. The guidelines are very easy to follow. Maintenance is very easy and requires very little manpower."
"The solution is fast."
"The most valuable feature of LocalDBis the connection between the application and DB."
"The initial setup was simple."
"Viewpoint, the detailed query logs and performance statistics are valuable features."
"I like this solution's ease of design and the fact that its performance is quite good. It is stable as well."
"Teradata's most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"Teradata's best feature is its speed with historical data."
"Teradata is a great, industry-leading data warehousing product that has MPP architecture."
"A conventional and easily defined way to build a data warehouse or a layer of data marts."
"The ability to handle machine data parallel processing is the most valuable feature of Teradata."
"Designing the database is easy."
"The initial setup is complex and requires a skilled person."
"The ALM features can be improved, but the database by itself is reliable."
"The solution needs to create a management tool. Right now, the solution has tools for creating a local installation, but it's too simplistic. We need something that's a bit more complex so that we can extend the tools with our scripts."
"The internal connection features of LocalDB could improve."
"Limited interest and success in some areas make us hesitate about upgrading."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"I've been using the same UI for 20 years in Teradata. It could use some updating. Adding more stability around Teradata Studio would be outstanding. Teradata Studio is a Java-based version of their tool. It's much better now, but it still has some room for improvement."
"The following could be better: licensing, architecture openness, integration with other tools."
"The cloud is the new challenge and the new opportunity."
"I would like to see an improved Knowledge Base on the web."
"Apart from Control-M, it would be nice if it could integrate with other tools."
"The setup is not straightforward."
LocalDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases Tools with 5 reviews while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. LocalDB is rated 9.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of LocalDB writes "Good for the development process, generally stable, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". LocalDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle Database In-Memory, Oracle Database and Infobright DB, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery. See our LocalDB vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.