HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric vs Netezza Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric and Netezza Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudera, Apache, Amazon and others in Hadoop.
To learn more, read our detailed Hadoop Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Arnab Chatterjee
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The model creation was very interesting, especially with the libraries provided by the platform.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.""I like the administration part.""HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric can be accessed from any namespace globally as you would access it from a machine using an NFS.""My customers find the product cheaper compared to other solutions. The previous solution that we used did not have unified analytics like the runtime or the analog."

More HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric Pros →

"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution.""It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data.""Speed contributes to large capacity.""The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution.""The most valuable feature is the performance.""For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable.""Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."

More Netezza Analytics Pros →

Cons
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools.""Upgrading Ezmeral to a new version is a pain. They're trying to make the solution more container-friendly, so I think they're going in the right direction. The only problem we've had in the past was the upgrades. The process isn't smooth due to how the Red Hat operating system upgrades currently work.""The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release.""Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful.""The product is not user-friendly."

More HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric Cons →

"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support.""This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available.""I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life.""Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing.""The Analytics feature should be simplified.""In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there.""Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two.""The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."

More Netezza Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "HPE is flexible with you if you are an existing customer. They offer different models that might be beneficial for your organization. It all depends on how you negotiate."
  • "The tool's price is cheap and based on a usage basis. The solution's licensing costs are yearly and there are no extra costs."
  • "There is a need for my company to pay for the licensing costs of the solution."
  • More HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
  • "For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
  • "The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
  • More Netezza Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
    Top Answer:There are some drawbacks in HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric when it comes to the interoperability part. HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools. For example, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric… more »
    Top Answer:The main purpose of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric for me is that it acts as a database. In my company, we store our data with the help of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric. It is possible to use Spark engine with HPE… more »
    Top Answer:Here are some things to consider when migrating from Netezza to AWS Redshift A. Migrating your data from Netezza to Redshift may be done using methods such as: o Use a third-party tool to export… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    1,711
    Comparisons
    1,097
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    550
    Rating
    7.8
    11th
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    235
    Comparisons
    100
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MapR, MapR Data Platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    Forward-leaning companies win market share because they leverage data more effectively than their competitors. Unlock the potential of your data assets with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric (formerly MapR Data Platform). Empower your data science, analytics, and business teams by simplifying data management on a globally distributed scale. All with enterprise-grade reliability, security, and performance.

    IBM Netezza Analytics is an embedded, purpose-built, advanced analytics platform that empowers analytic enterprises to meet and exceed their business demands. As features, it can predict with more accuracy, deliver predictions faster and respond rapidly to changes.
    Sample Customers
    Valence Health, Goodgame Studios, Pico, Terbium Labs, sovrn, Harte Hanks, Quantium, Razorsight, Novartis, Experian, Dentsu ix, Pontis Transitions, DataSong, Return Path, RAPP, HP
    A leading online advertising network
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Hadoop
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudera, Apache, Amazon and others in Hadoop. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is ranked 5th in Hadoop with 12 reviews while Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop. HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is rated 8.0, while Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric writes "It's flexible and easily accessible across multiple locations, but the upgrade process is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is most compared with Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, Amazon EMR, MongoDB, IBM Spectrum Computing and Hortonworks Data Platform, whereas Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL.

    See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.