We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric and Netezza Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop."The model creation was very interesting, especially with the libraries provided by the platform."
"I like the administration part."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric can be accessed from any namespace globally as you would access it from a machine using an NFS."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"My customers find the product cheaper compared to other solutions. The previous solution that we used did not have unified analytics like the runtime or the analog."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools."
"Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful."
"Upgrading Ezmeral to a new version is a pain. They're trying to make the solution more container-friendly, so I think they're going in the right direction. The only problem we've had in the past was the upgrades. The process isn't smooth due to how the Red Hat operating system upgrades currently work."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
"The Analytics feature should be simplified."
"This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available."
HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is ranked 5th in Hadoop with 12 reviews while Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop. HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is rated 8.0, while Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric writes "It's flexible and easily accessible across multiple locations, but the upgrade process is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is most compared with Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, Amazon EMR, IBM Spectrum Computing, MongoDB and SAP HANA, whereas Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.