We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and nlyte based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management."The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"We can manage, organize, and track incidents, claims, jobs, tasks, preventive and corrective maintenance, locations, and assets."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."
"Provides great flexibility."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"The power management aspect of nlyte provides a comprehensive overview of power consumption and forecasting capabilities. It allows for strategic planning, such as assessing the impact of adding new racks with specific power requirements. This feature facilitates considerations not only for power consumption but also for thermal aspects, including airflow dynamics between hot and cold aisles. In essence, the most advantageous feature of nlyte sfor us lies in its power management capabilities."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning."
"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline."
"This solution could improve by integrating or embedding finances, charts of accounts, and invoicing."
"Nylte is quite intricate to use. Training someone to navigate the platform would likely require a substantial investment, ranging from one to two months for basic proficiency, followed by an additional two to three months of consistent use to gain full proficiency. Despite its complexity, I believe there is room for simplification, making it more user-friendly. While there have been improvements, there is potential for further enhancements in this area."
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while nlyte is ranked 10th in Data Center Infrastructure Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while nlyte is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of nlyte writes "A Software Solution synchronizing information and activities to other systems that depend on accurate physical infrastructure information". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, NetSuite ERP, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM and IFS Cloud Platform, whereas nlyte is most compared with Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT, Device42, Sunbird DCIM and CommScope iTracs.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.