We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment."
"The installation process is easy."
"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."
"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."
"Good for managing and administering the infrastructure."
"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there."
"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."
"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."
"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."
"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."
"Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft System Center is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Good review of configurations, effective antivirus administration, and has weekly reports". On the other hand, Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.