Microsoft System Center vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Managment Packs for Microsoft-specific products, help us implement the best practices for each product.""System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment.""I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date.""Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure.""We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it.""The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment.""The product's initial setup phase was easy.""Good for managing and administering the infrastructure."

More Microsoft System Center Pros →

"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times.""The solution’s pricing could be improved.""The solution's dashboard needs improvement.""We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable.""The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration.""They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution.""Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports.""Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."

More Microsoft System Center Cons →

"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We maximized our license investment."
  • "It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
  • "Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."
  • "I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."
  • More Microsoft System Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was easy.
    Top Answer:I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous.
    Top Answer:In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times. Our company has to use certain steps with SQL to deal with the dataflow area, making it an easy process… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    280
    Comparisons
    145
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    7.8
    Unranked
    In Application Infrastructure
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS System Center
    NetWeaver BPM
    Learn More
    Overview
    System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.
    SAP Netweaver BPM allows companies to design their process, deploy it, Identify the bottlenecks and finally optimize the process by removing these bottlenecks and hence increasing transparency, efficiency and maintainability.
    Sample Customers
    Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia
    Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise50%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft System Center is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Good review of configurations, effective antivirus administration, and has weekly reports". On the other hand, Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.