We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and Tintri VMstore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."We use the solution for internal business purposes."
"The most valuable features are monitoring, and the self-service that they have for a customized environment."
"It is a scalable solution...I followed some online tutorials, because of which I did not face any technical issues or the need to contact the solution's technical support."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a highly scalable solution."
"The greatest aspect of the solution is its capability to be available from anywhere."
"The product is reliable."
"The tool is perfectly stable."
"It has proven to be most effective for workloads associated with running web portals."
"Performance, cost, and ease of storage management."
"I like Tintri's Global Admin feature and the solution's performance. It's incredibly fast storage, which was a significant upgrade for us when we deployed it seven years ago. The Tintri snapshots are brilliant and incredibly reliable."
"Simplicity of installation and management, high IOPS, management per VM, QoS, power and space saving."
"It is a set and forget environment with a very good tooling to view performance and delivers the IOPS we need for our VDI environment."
"The cloning is very fast... Another aspect I like is that it's very simple. It's an easy GUI to use."
"You can control resources on a per VM basis to ensure that contention in resources does not hamper performance."
"Tintri VMstore is rock solid. We have not had a single issue with stability. It is also very low maintenance allowing us to concentrate on project work."
"Its speed has been absolutely fantastic."
"It would be good if the tool's integration improved."
"The product must provide easier rollouts."
"Support could always be a bit better."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"The main thing that could be improved is the licensing cost."
"The product must reduce the cost by 40%."
"They should introduce a way to localize the currency for product pricing."
"Server security can always be improved."
"More cloud integration."
"In sync and automated mirror between two Tintris is missing."
"Speed of our VDI machines. We have a very high log in and log out ratio and machines are being refreshed instantly so we have a constant boot storm on our storage."
"I would like to be able to add more storage capacity to our 2 units down the road with out buying an additional seprate array."
"Tintri's Cloud Connector currently only goes to AWS and IBM Cloud, and we don't use either because we're Microsoft Silver Partners. It would be great to get the Cloud Connector feature with Azure. If it's not already on Tintri's roadmap, that's something I'd like to see."
"I'm waiting to see the Kubernetes package. I know they're releasing one, but I haven't seen it yet."
"What I feel would be nice, in terms of a wishlist, is scalability. Rather than replacing the whole appliance, I would like to be able to just add another unit and scale it like that."
"Their current replication is really just enough to "check the box" that they do replication. We'll probably implement Actifio, Zerto or EMC RecoverPoint for VMs for more critical data replication."
Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 31 reviews while Tintri VMstore is ranked 15th in All-Flash Storage with 61 reviews. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while Tintri VMstore is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Has a good interface but needs to improve in areas like pricing and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri VMstore writes "We were able to push a button—it really is that simple—and flip primary and secondary storage locations". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas Tintri VMstore is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell PowerStore, HPE Nimble Storage, VMware vSAN and NetApp AFF.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
