We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and Tintri VMstore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."It is stable and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share folders and run Active Directory."
"It is an expensive platform. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"We use the solution for internal business purposes."
"It has proven to be most effective for workloads associated with running web portals."
"The solution is good at allowing end users to connect anytime and anywhere."
"The product provides flexibility."
"The standout features are its seamless network integration, robust data restoration capabilities, and versatile computing functions."
"The ability to snap machines into VMware quickly is valuable."
"Simplicity of installation and management, high IOPS, management per VM, QoS, power and space saving."
"It has easy setup, easy administration, and no LUNs!"
"Upgrades are super easy and can be done during business hours without interruptions in production."
"It is a set and forget environment with a very good tooling to view performance and delivers the IOPS we need for our VDI environment."
"Web GUI for maintenance and resource monitoring purposes is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the VM management."
"We have been able to scale up to ten VM storages and 500 VMs through a single pane of glass."
"While I am generally satisfied with the solution, it could slightly improve its stability."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its stability."
"The security performance and cost."
"There could be more security features included in the product."
"The interface should be improved."
"The tool must provide updates less frequently."
"The platform’s dashboard features could be better."
"The main thing that could be improved is the licensing cost."
"I'm waiting to see the Kubernetes package. I know they're releasing one, but I haven't seen it yet."
"I think with the world soon becoming only SSD, possibly NVMe, and 3D Xpoint. It would make sense for Tintri to drop the hybrid array down the line."
"I would love more insight into each virtual machine statistic."
"The biggest area for improvement, and there has been some roadmap work in this area already, is cloud integration... Tintri has been investing in this area and I'm sure will continue to, but cloud integration has been the biggest area that we've been crossing our fingers and hoping for quick development around."
"Active/active cluster between two Tintris on Hyper-V cluster."
"I would like it to have the ability to store data other than virtual machines. At the moment, you can only connect VMs to it, and that’s a bit disappointing."
"The solution is already good but the brand name is not so popular here."
"On the software side, I suggest adding integration with backups software like CommVault Simpana or Veeam where these products can integrate with the array and trigger things like snapshots for backup, etc."
Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 31 reviews while Tintri VMstore is ranked 15th in All-Flash Storage with 61 reviews. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while Tintri VMstore is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Has a good interface but needs to improve in areas like pricing and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri VMstore writes "We were able to push a button—it really is that simple—and flip primary and secondary storage locations". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas Tintri VMstore is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell PowerStore, HPE Nimble Storage, VMware vSAN and NetApp AFF.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
