We compared Nagios XI and Zabbix based on our users' reviews across several parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Nagios XI is praised for its ease of deployment, real-time monitoring capabilities, and comprehensive reporting features. However, users have raised concerns about the outdated interface, lack of detailed documentation, and limited customizability of alerts. Zabbix is lauded for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable alerting system, user-friendly interface, and responsive customer service. Users appreciate the value of their investment and reasonable pricing of Zabbix, though some have suggested improvements in the user interface, documentation, and scalability.
Features: Nagios XI boasts ease of monitoring multiple systems and customizable alerts. Zabbix excels in comprehensive monitoring, user-friendly interface, and extensive reporting. Nagios XI emphasizes integration capabilities. Zabbix focuses on monitoring various system aspects.
Pricing and ROI: Nagios XI has a minimal setup cost, while Zabbix has no setup costs. Nagios XI offers transparent pricing and value for investment, while Zabbix users find the pricing reasonable and the licensing flexible. Both are considered competitive options in terms of cost., Nagios XI users noticed improved productivity, efficiency, and system visibility with quick issue resolution and cost savings. Customizable alerts prevented downtime, ensuring smooth operations. Zabbix users reported positive outcomes, proving to be a valuable investment for their organization.
Room for Improvement: Nagios XI users have cited outdated interface, lack of detailed documentation, limited customizability of alerts, and high cost as areas needing improvement. Zabbix users suggest enhancing user interface, providing better documentation, improving scalability, and performance.
Deployment and customer support: Nagios XI has a range of deployment options with different complexity levels. Zabbix's setup can vary in difficulty and may require clear documentation and customization for success. Deployment durations for Nagios XI range from 30 minutes to a few months, while for Zabbix, it can take hours to weeks. Customers of Nagios XI appreciate the efficient technical support provided, though there are occasional delays in being connected to the appropriate representative. Zabbix users favor self-help resources such as manuals and community forums.
The summary above is based on 54 interviews we conducted recently with Nagios XI and Zabbix users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where I can have a single screen that provides a summary for hundreds of servers."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of processes."
"Nagios XI helps us monitor the bandwidth of the internet connection, HTTP, DNS, active directory services, and exchange data availability. We have multiple servers to monitor databases, availability of servers, and ping."
"It is an open-source platform with valuable features for performance and stability."
"Nagios is a custom API manager, and we can expose custom APIs for our integration. This is a great feature."
"The solution is pretty stable."
"Since this is an open source technology, if we are capable of writing the plugins in any scripting language, this product allows us to monitor anything we want."
"The Script Module in Nagios is really easy to use and is really cost efficient."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"We use Zabbix to monitor our organization's IT infrastructure and workstations. We don't use Microsoft Intune since it's expensive. The tool's real-time alerting system has proved crucial for us, particularly when a new device joins a network that is not one of our own devices. It notifies us about the presence of this new device, allowing us to investigate further. Additionally, it alerts us about disk usage, memory usage, and the software installed on the machine."
"Zabbix has a roadmap and they are continuously and frequently adding new features."
"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."
"Its overall flexibility is most valuable. When our customers have some custom applications that are not necessarily covered by the community or a standard monitoring tool, we use Zabbix to build our own modules with our own templates. This feature has been useful in using Zabbix for infrastructure and IT monitoring. It has also been useful for industrial equipment monitoring. Zabbix is very lightweight. It is efficient in terms of performance because it doesn't use a lot of resources."
"The solution allows for good integration with other products."
"The most valuable feature is network traffic monitoring."
"The level of discovery-based configuration that lets us auto-configure the monitoring for various systems is a valuable feature."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"It is really difficult to integrate Nagios XI with another system to generate logs and alert our management of failures in security infrastructure."
"I would like to be able to extend it to all of our data centers, whether they are in the cloud or not. It would be helpful if I could connect everywhere."
"The Configuration Wizard needs improvement, because not all vendors are present."
"The product does not have SAP monitoring."
"Nagios XI can improve its GUI for users with a new look."
"Improve the documentation, examples, and best practices, therefore users can understand how to do things."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement. It is not available 24/7."
"The reporting part should be made simpler. While we can obtain all the reports we need, we always have to create work-arounds to get them."
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."
"Its UI needs to be improved a little bit more so that an end-user is also able to handle it. I can handle it, but others should also be able to handle it in a better way. It becomes complex when we are growing and need to add proxies. We need more scalability features and documentation for different use cases. A lot of articles are available, but they need to be in proper documentation. For example, when you have thousands of servers that have to be monitored in different regions of the world, there should be some kind of documentation to describe how you can create proxies and add them. Sometimes, when you are using the database, it can get overloaded. When the network is growing, the number of transactions becomes very high, and the database gets overloaded. There should be information about how to reduce the load on the MySQL database, which is what Zabbix is using. The market is growing a lot, and it should be enhanced for a lot more things. We are currently bringing enhancements at our end for different use cases. For example, when dockerization is going on, how can we check the logs inside the Dockers. We should also be able to monitor and check the number of logins and add features such as SSO login and two-factor authentication as a protocol. These are the security features and concerns that we have to deal with. Currently, we are developing modules to add features to Zabbix, but they should also work on these features."
"Zabbix isn't a great tool for cloud-specific monitoring - its connection to public clouds needs to be improved. Other areas for improvement would be the lack of dashboards and integrations."
"The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance."
"If you want to use all of the features then you have to pay a licensing fee."
"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."
Nagios XI is ranked 10th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 54 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 2nd in Cloud Monitoring Software with 98 reviews. Nagios XI is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nagios XI writes "Great for monitoring IT services infrastructure with nice tools and helpful notifications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Nagios XI is most compared with Nagios Core, PRTG Network Monitor, Icinga, Wireshark and SCOM, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Amazon CloudWatch. See our Nagios XI vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
ZABBIX ... of course :)
We are working with this wonderful monitoring tool since 2008
ZABBIX ... of course :)
We have been working with this wonderful monitoring tool since 2007 (before we had used Nagios, Openview, Whatsup, Hobbitmon, etc) and until now we haven't seen any limitations in our projects.
If you need to learn a little bit more about 'how to customize ZABBIX' you can search about:
- ZABBIX UserParameters;
- ZABBIX pluggable modules;
- ZABBIX LLD;
- ZABBIX API;
I think this things will help a lot to know how to extend/customize ZABBIX.
Luciano