We performed a comparison between Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."The feature of taking snapshots from the replicated volumes has allowed us to use them for DR testing to validate the application consistent point of recovery."
"We've found the support to be very good overall."
More Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] Pros →
"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."
"There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive."
"The product has good performance."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."
"Data protection is a valuable feature."
"The technology enables us to have a safe backup."
"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."
"If you are new to the product, the initial setup might be a bit difficult."
"The main pain point that we experienced is during device creation. For every newly provisioned volume, creating replication relationships between production and DR site, creating snapshots for third copy at DR site, and configuring them in appropriate replication groups and device groups means that there are lot of steps involved and a lot of room for error. There has to be a lot of checks and balances which need to be incorporated to make sure that the solution is set up correctly."
More Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] Cons →
"Compression and deduplication could be improved."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them."
"The tool should also work on third-party solutions."
"The price needs to be improved."
Earn 20 points
Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Replication while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 23 reviews. Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] is rated 9.2, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] writes "RPO and RTO have improved drastically". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "Protects our data during any emergency or disaster". Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] is most compared with Dell RecoverPoint and Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with NetApp Snapshot, Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell AppSync.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.