We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli NetCool and OpenText Network Node Manager i based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Management Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Anything is possible with Tivoli. It's quite a robust system."
"It's very easy to use."
"The solution has very good integration capabilities."
"The tool had many built-in automation capabilities."
"It's very easy to use."
"Support is one of the best aspects of this solution. NetCool is a good product that has good flexibility. There are a lot of documents available online which is one of the best features of IBM Tivoli Suite. Whenever an issue happens, rather than going to technical support, if you find the exact issue in Google, you can get tech notes for that particular issue."
"NetCool has a huge database that can collect and process about one million alarms a day."
"Tivoli NetCool allows us to grasp a lot of data that can be applied toward predictive analytics and auto-remediation."
"Topology creation is the most valuable feature."
"It is stable for fault and availability."
"The best feature is the solution's entire credibility with all vendors."
"Our monitoring and network teams of less than 100 people use this solution. The availability and fault monitoring are good."
"If you install one node on Network Node Manager and want to scale it up, it's pretty easy to create more nodes."
"We do not have any issues stability-wise."
"A good enterprise-level solution."
"It is a scalable product."
"The solution is too expensive."
"The installation could be simplified, and technical support could be faster."
"The solution does not have any AI capabilities."
"UI is outdated, very old legacy."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"The installation could be simplified, and technical support could be faster."
"Tivoli NetCool is based on a Linux platform, it would be beneficial if they moved it to Windows because not everyone is acquainted with Linux."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to see more AIOps, Artificial Intelligent Operations in the next release. IBM develops new features for Power BI or Cognos Analytics, which is good. As of now, we use Cognos Analytics, we are not using Power BI. They have the Insight concept but we don't like that."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not the best when it comes to drilling down for more visibility, especially regarding traffic."
"The solution should integrate with NAC servers."
"The resources utilized could be a bit higher, and that is one of the challenges that isn't optimized"
"Reporting. Even though this is available in separate software (iSPI) there is potential in making the reporting more SLA-aware and more intuitive."
"The way the solution currently works means I'm not able to customize my own reports."
"The dashboards are not customizable and it's not user-friendly."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not powered to drill down for traffic visibility."
"Right now, we have open tickets and they are not closing as expected."
More OpenText Network Node Manager i Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Tivoli NetCool is ranked 8th in Network Management Applications with 12 reviews while OpenText Network Node Manager i is ranked 9th in Network Management Applications with 23 reviews. IBM Tivoli NetCool is rated 7.6, while OpenText Network Node Manager i is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli NetCool writes "Reliable for enterprise monitoring but no longer actively developed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Node Manager i writes "Easy-to-implement product with a valuable map topology feature". IBM Tivoli NetCool is most compared with SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, HPE Intelligent Management Center, Moogsoft, Cisco DNA Center and DX Spectrum, whereas OpenText Network Node Manager i is most compared with SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Cisco DNA Center, Fortinet FortiManager and DX Spectrum. See our IBM Tivoli NetCool vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
I have excellent experiences with HP Network Node Manager.
A mature tool with good human Interface - reducing Errors.
The choice between 2 which both are not that friendly.... Guess it is really up to
what your requirements are. Netcool is a very good system and very
flexible, as where HP is somewhat limited. The only thing with IBM is that
it is bloody expensive and they are arrogant. If you don't spend enough they
will not help. So again, comes down to the requirements and wishes, the
organisation where it needs to be implemented and the level of self support
an organisation can provide themselves....
There are more alternatives out there...
On youtube the IBM service management highlights how Mibtree uses IBM Netcool Operations Insight with Analytics to provide better insights and better understand IT operations and support for their customer's IT Operations. On the other hand, HP enterprise business talks about bringing value to customers with HP Network Node Manager. So then you can compare easier I think.
BR
Shadi
Based on my experience I would suggest you for Entuity - EYE which got perfect features required for a Network monitoring tool requirement. Feature like In-Depth Real time monitoring, Flows, Network Maps, Inventory Management, Event Management, easy to integrate.
If you have not heared from SevOne and have been in contact with them.
Please do, It will save you a lot of money and you will be the champ
forever.
You can compare it as riding a bike (you have to paddle) versus a solar
driven car that works
If you do so, send me a credit for buying a cake. That will do for me :)
THX, Ronald Jansen